Electricity, gas, water, raw materials, and waste volumes: Any carbon footprint calculation has to take numerous factors into account. The type and amount of data required vary from product to product, and values for the same material from various suppliers can differ. For some sources, important data is missing or cannot be used. Sustainability officers still have to examine it and then search for more reliable information in reference databases, if necessary.
The corporate carbon footprint data in the sustainability report must comply with the Greenhouse Gas Protocol (GHG) in accordance with the CSRD. Particularly difficult to determine are the Scope 3 emissions that occur outside a company’s direct sphere of responsibility. This also applies to the carbon footprint of every single product, which is increasingly being the topic in customer inquiries.
“The sustainability report is a huge task for companies to deal with,” says Luisa Swetlik. As Innovation Manager Sustainability at NTT DATA Business Solutions, she is familiar with the challenge from both her own experience and her collaboration with client companies. “The components of a product can be quickly retrieved as a parts list from SAP. But, gathering, reviewing and bringing together the associated emission levels in a structured way is a complex detailed procedure,” explains Swetlik. Currently, most companies have neither established processes nor suitable tools for doing this. Many companies are expected to submit a sustainability report in accordance with the CSRD for the first time in 2027.
From Excel to an integrated sustainability solution
Things are different for Mosca GmbH, a specialist in end-of-line solutions. This long-established medium-sized company produces machinery and materials for packaging and securing the transportation of unit loads. Here, management has had experience in preparing sustainability reports since 2021. “Initially, we used an Excel-based calculator to determine the product footprint. This was a lot of manual work, which meant it was time-consuming and prone to errors,” reports Ann Mertens, Sustainability Officer at Mosca.
The challenge? This approach proved unsuitable for providing effective support to all parties involved. “Very few people were able to handle the complex table structure,” recalls Mertens. However, because the required data is spread across different departments, it is not possible to collect data efficiently and automatically for the annual sustainability reports. Not to mention making quick adjustments if, for example, a workflow is modified in a production process or a supplier changes.
That is why Mosca set out to find a suitable solution for managing CO₂e emissions data, where “e” stands for “CO₂ equivalent”. The unit of measurement is used to compare GHG emissions of different gases in a single unit, namely the equivalent amount of carbon dioxide (CO₂). A project group specially established at Mosca quickly found the Sustainability Data Simplified solution from NTT DATA Business Solutions. “We’ve been working with the company as a partner in the SAP environment for years, so it made sense to take a look at their Sustainability Data Simplified offering,” explains Mertens.